just talked to espresso and we thought that playin each map 3 times is too much. there are only 2 teams anyways, so playin each map twice would be enough in our opinion. let us know what u think about it
btw hunter, would've talked to u b4, but didnt c ya in a while
PLS VOTE
- =|C*G*A|= Elias Col
- Corporal
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008
- Location: bei Würzburg
- Contact:
I fully agree ID, talked to Hunter therefore too.iD wrote: we thought that playin each map 3 times is too much. there are only 2 teams anyways, so playin each map twice would be enough in our opinion.
- [RC]Hunter
- Site Admin
-
Sergeant
- Posts: 2377
- Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008
- Location: Hue City
- Favorite Server: All of them
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 19 times
-
Loading…
I am currently on some business travels and therefore cannot logon to the net constantly.
Just to clarify in public - besides the ones I spoke to individually already in the past - what the reason is to run each map 3 times instead of two times (which is not a default btw.) ...
To my opinion there are two types of players, one does prefer to get on the game and play a few different maps in a road. Others prefer or just come on if a flight map or infantry map is running and as soon it switches to the opposite, players leave the server. Running the maps the way they are ordered, plus the amount of rounds aimed to have the server busy a longer time with a similar groups of players, since I do like as well to play more often against the same players I meet in matches before, either for a payback or a repeated defeat.
So just to make sure everybody understands that it is not just an idea of someone out of his mood.
Just to clarify in public - besides the ones I spoke to individually already in the past - what the reason is to run each map 3 times instead of two times (which is not a default btw.) ...
To my opinion there are two types of players, one does prefer to get on the game and play a few different maps in a road. Others prefer or just come on if a flight map or infantry map is running and as soon it switches to the opposite, players leave the server. Running the maps the way they are ordered, plus the amount of rounds aimed to have the server busy a longer time with a similar groups of players, since I do like as well to play more often against the same players I meet in matches before, either for a payback or a repeated defeat.
So just to make sure everybody understands that it is not just an idea of someone out of his mood.
I understand Hunter. But I constantly find myself thinking that two rounds per map would be enough. Sometimes I logged off the server just because I didn't want to play the same map for a third round. Some matches can get annoyingly long when there are a lot of bots online...
But as I said before. I understand you have your reasons for 3 rounds per map as well. So let's see how the vote turns out.
Greetz
espresso
But as I said before. I understand you have your reasons for 3 rounds per map as well. So let's see how the vote turns out.
Greetz
espresso
i can see the reason for hunter making 3 rounds per map, i still think that 2 would be enough. as you said, it's for players who join to play a certain map or a certain kind of map, which seems reasonable. on the other hand u mentioned urself, that maps of a certain kind r followed by similar maps in the map rotation to make players stay. it seems to me that every type of player is well served anyways, if he joins to play a fav map and even gets a similar one afterwards. following this line of argumentation there is no real need for the 3 rounds. just as an example, on some maps 90% of the players want to stay u.s., for whatever amount of rounds. to even it up, we usually help the weaker team. but honestly, having to play one team (which is usually the side with less chances to win on the map, which is the reason for the majority of ppl playing the other side) on the same map for 3 rounds can be a pain in the ass and that makes ppl leave as well.